Taking Freedom for Granted
Nov 20, 2006 07:32 Filed in: Civil
Liberties
As a lawyer who has been involved with the criminal
law for 27 years (defense), I have always been
interested in what students are taught about the
Constitution and how it affects their attitudes
towards civil liberties. A recent survey by the Knight
Foundation reported in the Clarion-Ledger
today found that "[i]n 2006, high school
students tend to be more knowledgeable about the
First Amendment, and less supportive of the
freedoms it promises." In other words, merely
teaching kids about the First Amendment won't
necessarily create a love of freedom in them. A
thorough grounding in the historical background
of the Bill of Rights might go a long way
towards inculcating such a love of freedom, but
if the zeitgeist is blowing the other way, it is
doubtful that any such knowledge will make much
difference to the average American.
Americans are particularly prone to regard themselves as unique and exempt from the consequences that ordinarily flow from their actions or their inaction, which is why they regard the study of history either as a form of entertainment or simply a waste of time. Historical examples of this myopia are easy to find, but such examples are wasted on a people that don't believe that the past is a guide to the present. Thus the 1990s saw such ahistorical notions as Fukiyama's End of History and the talk about the "new economy" that purported to refute the second law of thermodynamics. That foolishness has already been forgotten and similar snake oil is being sold today, often by the same people and institutions.
Occasionally, during moments of self-questioning, I allow the possibility that perhaps the conservatives are right—that freedom is a privilege reserved for the "better sort of people," who can use their freedom responsibly—but then I remember that the elite idea of "responsibility" has nearly always consisted exclusively of maintaining one's privileged social and economic position, irrespective of the general good. In fact, it is rare that elites do anything to further the general good that would threaten their power or wealth.
The conclusion, which is an historical one: We can appreciate liberty only by neglecting it and finally losing it.
Americans are particularly prone to regard themselves as unique and exempt from the consequences that ordinarily flow from their actions or their inaction, which is why they regard the study of history either as a form of entertainment or simply a waste of time. Historical examples of this myopia are easy to find, but such examples are wasted on a people that don't believe that the past is a guide to the present. Thus the 1990s saw such ahistorical notions as Fukiyama's End of History and the talk about the "new economy" that purported to refute the second law of thermodynamics. That foolishness has already been forgotten and similar snake oil is being sold today, often by the same people and institutions.
Occasionally, during moments of self-questioning, I allow the possibility that perhaps the conservatives are right—that freedom is a privilege reserved for the "better sort of people," who can use their freedom responsibly—but then I remember that the elite idea of "responsibility" has nearly always consisted exclusively of maintaining one's privileged social and economic position, irrespective of the general good. In fact, it is rare that elites do anything to further the general good that would threaten their power or wealth.
The conclusion, which is an historical one: We can appreciate liberty only by neglecting it and finally losing it.
|